Legal Opinion
Hankla v. Governing Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 1975No. Civ. 34502PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTT, J.
Randolph Hankla appeals from denial of his petition for writ of mandate or prohibition seeking reinstatement as a certified permanent employee of the Roseland School District.
On April 1, 1971, while- Hankla was the principal of the Shepard Elementary School in the Roseland School District, he was charged with violations of Penal .Code section 272 (contributing to the delinquency of a minor by causing the minor to place his hand on Hankla’s penis) and Penal Code section 314 (indecent exposure). Upon being informed of the charges, respondent immediately placed Hankla upon…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Uniformed Sanitation Men Ass'n v. Commissioner of Sanitation of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Szmaciarz v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- McIntee v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Nikwei v. Ross School of Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Hoschler v. Sacramento City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Barrett v. BryantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.