Legal Opinion

Huff v. Shiomi

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 1985No. A8208-05083; CA A33098PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action in August, 1982, against defendant Shiomi, her physician, alleging that she had developed cataracts from medication that he had prescribed and that plaintiff had purchased over the period from April, 1973, to January, 1975. Plaintiff did not name Kirkman Laboratories, the manufacturer of the medicine, as a defendant. In December, 1983, Shiomi filed a third-party complaint for indemnity against Kirkman. Kirkman moved to dismiss the third-party action “on the grounds that the * * * pleadings * * * ‘show [that that] action has not been commenced within the time…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Miller v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Valley Circle Estates v. VTN Consolidated, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Ore-Ida Foods, Inc. v. Indian Head Cattle Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Oksenholt v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fujitsu Microelectronics, Inc. v. Lam Research Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. PIH Beaverton, LLC v. Super One, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. State ex rel. State Accident Insurance Fund v. BarkmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Lethcoe v. BuffhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API