Legal Opinion

Concord Craftsmen, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 28, 1965No. 69606; protest 64/10902 (Boston)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

This ease involves the proper tariff classification of certain plastic mailbox covers which had been assessed with duty at .the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem, by similitude to manufactures, wholly or in chief value of cotton, as provided, respectively, in paragraph 1559(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1954, and in paragraph 923 of said act, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 90 Treas. Dec. 234, T.D. 53865, supplemented by Presidential notification, 90 Treas. Dee. 280, T.D. 53877.

P…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Hat Pin Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. Zenith Novelty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Jomac-North, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  4. Castelazo & Associates v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Humphrey v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Devon Tape Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Marmax Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API