Legal Opinion

Castelazo & Associates v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 15, 1961No. 66211; protest 60/10290 (Los Angeles)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest relates to merchandise that is generally described on the invoices as “Directa” protective crowns. It was classified, by *366similitude in use, to cellulose acetate articles under paragraph 31(a) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 64108, and paragraph 1659, as amended by T.D. 53599, with a duty assessment at the rate of 17 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiffs claim that the merchandise is properly classifiable under the provision for nonenumerated manufactured articles in paragraph 1558, as modified by T.D. 52739, supplemented by T.D. 52827, carrying…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Salentine & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Scientific Packaging Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Concord Craftsmen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API