Zenith Novelty Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
These three protests involve certain plastic articles. In protest 60/6702, the item in question is identified on the invoice as “C/No. Y — 4296/4331” and generally described as vinyl fishes. It was classified by similitude in use to compounds of cellulose, made into finished articles of which cellulose is the component material of chief value, under paragraph 31(b) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, and paragraph 1559, as amended, and assessed with duty at the rate of 25% per centum ad valorem. In protest 59/32330, the merchandise in dispute is described on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Salentine & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Wecolite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
3Cited by10 opinions
- Scientific Packaging Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Concord Craftsmen, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Dow Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Dynamic Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Hershey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.