Legal Opinion

Buikema v. Wagner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 17, 1936No. 25372PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In 1894, Etta Wagner, who was then about 35 years of age, married F. E. Wagner and moved to Oklahoma. They homesteaded the southwest quarter (S. W. %) of section ten (10), township sixteen (16) north, range ten (10) east, which is referred to hereafter as Farm No. 1. The patent therefor was issued to F. E. Wagner.

Later, on May 29, 1903, Etta Wagner, as grantee, acquired by warranty deed the southwest quarter (S. W. 14) of section nine (9), township sixteen (16) north, range ten (10) east, which is referred to hereafter as Farm No. 2, for $3,200, paid from her separate estate. They were…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Golden Gate Undertaking Co. v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Mendenhall v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Fulmer v. Pacific Southwest Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. In Re Kelly's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. In Re Assessment of First National Bank of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miljack, Inc. v. City of TulsaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API