Miljack, Inc. v. City of Tulsa
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1DissentAdams, Judge
As I read 47 O.S.1981 § 1-122, the airport road is a “highway” only if it is both “publicly maintained” and “open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel.” Although I agree with the majority that the undisputed facts establish the second of these requirements, I cannot agree this record shows the road to be “publicly maintained.”
When engaging in a private, proprietary enterprise a municipality conducts that enterprise as a private concern, and not in its governmental capacity. In so doing, its actions are governed “largely by the same rules applicable to individuals or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fretz v. City of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- City of McAlester v. State Ex Rel. State Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Public Service Company of Oklahoma v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- City of Blackwell v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.