Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miljack, Inc. v. City of Tulsa

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1992No. 75620Published

1DissentAdams, Judge

As I read 47 O.S.1981 § 1-122, the airport road is a “highway” only if it is both “publicly maintained” and “open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel.” Although I agree with the majority that the undisputed facts establish the second of these requirements, I cannot agree this record shows the road to be “publicly maintained.”

When engaging in a private, proprietary enterprise a municipality conducts that enterprise as a private concern, and not in its governmental capacity. In so doing, its actions are governed “largely by the same rules applicable to individuals or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fretz v. City of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. City of McAlester v. State Ex Rel. State Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. Public Service Company of Oklahoma v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. City of Blackwell v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API