Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
PETITION EOK A REHEARING. This was an application for leave tó file a petition for the rehearing of‘a case decided at October term, 1894, and reported in 158 U. S. 299, and of two other cases, argued with that case and decided in accordance with the decision in it. , The petition was as follows: “ And now comes the above named complainant, appellant, and respectfully petitions this honorable court to grant a rehearing in the three several above entitled causes, and for cause…
Read the full summary
PETITION EOK A REHEARING. This was an application for leave tó file a petition for the rehearing of‘a case decided at October term, 1894, and reported in 158 U. S. 299, and of two other cases, argued with that case and decided in accordance with the decision in it. , The petition was as follows: “ And now comes the above named complainant, appellant, and respectfully petitions this honorable court to grant a rehearing in the three several above entitled causes, and for cause therefor says: “ I. It seems to us entirely evident from a reading of the opinion of Mr. Justice Brown in this case,…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beown
A petition was filed at the last term for a rehearing in these cases upon the ground that the court erred in assuming judicial knowledge of the construction and operation of grain elevators, and in holding that these elevators contained practically the same elements as the grain transferring apparatus of the Richards patents. The argument is that the object of Mr. Richards’ invention was to obviate and do away with elevators, by securing the continuous and automatic transfer of grain from one car to another, weighing it in transit, and preserving the identity of each lot; whereas, in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- California v. HolladaySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
3Cited by61 opinions
- O'LEARY v. Liggett Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Maurice A. Garbell, Inc. v. Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1973
- John H. Emerson v. National Cylinder Gas Company, National Cylinder Gas Company v. John H. Emerson, National Cylinder Gas Company v. John H. EmersonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1958
- Detroit Motor Appliance Co. v. BurkeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1925
- Panduit Corporation v. Burndy Corporation and Burndy Midwest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.