Legal Opinion

In re Cronin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 2, 2006Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this *830Court in 1985. She resides in the City of Binghamton, Broome County. By decision dated February 20, 2001, this Court suspended her from practice pending her compliance with an order which directed her to appear before petitioner for an examination under oath (see Matter of Cronin, 280 AD2d 874 [2001]).

Respondent now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner advises that it does not oppose reinstatement, but notes that respondent has failed to reimburse approximately $4,000 owed to three former clients.

We conclude that respondent has substantially…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re CofinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. In re DixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re WojcikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. In re CroninAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. In re TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API