Legal Opinion

In re Wojcik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Per Curiam.

Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, by petition of charges and specifications dated August 14, 1991, has accused respondent of failing to preserve client funds, resuming the practice of law in violation of an order of this court, and submitting improperly notarized documents to the Rensselaer County Surrogate’s Court.

On November 7, 1991, we granted petitioner’s motion for an order declaring that no factual issues were raised by the petition and respondent’s answer (22 NYCRR 806.5). We heard respondent in mitigation on December 19, 1991.

In our prior decision…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re WojcikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re CroninAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re WojcikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API