Legal Opinion

In re Dixon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1989 and maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Schenectady, Schenectady County.

We grant petitioner’s motion to confirm a Referee’s report that sustained four charges of professional misconduct against respondent. He neglected an appeal in a divorce matter by failing to perfect the appeal and failing to appear at a conference scheduled by this Court’s Civil Appeals Settlement Program (see Code of Professional Responsibility DR 6-101 [a] [3] [22 NYCRR 1200.30 (a) (3)]), failed to communicate with his client…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re HaasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re RelyeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re CroninAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re DixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API