Legal Opinion

Administaff, Inc. v. Kaster

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided July 22, 1992No. Civ. A. A-91-CA-805PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SPARKS, District Judge.

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand, filed November 8, 1991, and Defendant’s Motion for More Definite Statement, filed October 16, 1991. Upon review of those motions, as well as the entire file in this case, the Court finds the Motion for Remand has merit and should be granted.

I. Procedural History

Plaintiff originally filed this action on October 3, 1991, in the 200th District Court of Travis County, Texas, alleging state and federal claims. On October 11, 1991, Defendants removed the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c) alleging this Court’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Marvin Fielder, Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Similarly Situated Individuals, - Appellees/ Cross v. Credit Acceptance Corporation, - Appellant/ CrossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. Padilla v. City of SaginawDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
  3. Kabealo v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
  4. Spaulding v. Mingo County Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
  5. Bodenner v. GravesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API