Legal Opinion
Daniels v. United States
District Court, D. Montana
Decided October 19, 1962No. Civ. 896PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam 1
This is an action to review an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission dated November 21, 1961, in Docket No. MC-C-2507, W. M. Daniels-Investigation of Second Proviso Eligibility. The sole question presented is whether plaintiff’s interstate operations in Montana, pursuant to his Montana Interstate Permit M.R.C. No. 284, fall within the partial exemption of the second proviso of section 206(a) (1) of the Interstate Commerce Act.
Under section 206(a) (1) (49 U.S.C.A. § 306(a) (1)), except as otherwise provided therein “ * * * no common carrier by motor vehicle * * * shall engage in any…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
- North Alabama Express, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978