Legal Opinion

Gaudina v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 25, 2004No. 89,217PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gernon, J.:

This is an appeal by Robert J. Gaudina from a trial court ruling that he was not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel as alleged in his K.S.A. 60-1507 motion. We transferred the case pursuant to K.S.A. 20-3018(c).

Gaudina raises three issues: (1) the legality of his enhanced sentences; (2) whether he was entitled to an evidentiaiy hearing; and (3) whether the trial court violated Kansas Supreme Court Rule 183(j) (2003 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 213), which requires a district court to make findings of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. State v. GouldSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  4. Carmichael v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. State v. NeerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  2. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. State v. BerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. State v. GaudinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Fischer v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API