Legal Opinion
State v. Neer
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 13, 1990No. 63,752PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lockett, J.:
Edward E. Neer appeals the district court’s refusal to modify his sentence. In addition, Neer argues that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction for aggravated criminal sodomy in case 86 CR 983 based on our holding in State v. Moppin, 245 Kan. 639, Syl. ¶ 1, 783 P.2d 878 (1989), that oral-genital stimulation between the tongue of a male and the genital area of a female is not “sodomy” under K.S.A. 21-3501(2).
Neer was charged with one count of aggravated criminal sodomy (K.S.A. 21-3506) in case 86 CR 983 on June 20, 1986,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Cooke v. GillespieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Bledsoe v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Windom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Rowland v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. NealSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.