Legal Opinion

Foster Wheeler Corp. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 41713PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEINER, District Judge.

This phase of a patent controversy is before us on defendant’s motion to dismiss or transfer.

Plaintiff Foster Wheeler is a manufacturer of a flash evaporating apparatus for the distillation of water. Defendant Aqua-Chem is a competitor holding patents on such an apparatus which are the subject of this suit, wherein Foster Wheeler moved, on December 13, 1966, for declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1338(a) and 2201 to determine the validity of the Aqua-Chem Letters Patent Nos. Re. 25,232 and 3,-213,000. Aqua-Chem, in turn, has petitioned to dismiss, or, in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. A. J. Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. Leesona Corporation v. Duplan CorporationDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1970
  3. Ransburg Corp. v. Automatic Finishing Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Hypro, Inc. v. Seeger-Wanner Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
  5. Emerson Electric Co. v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API