Legal Opinion

City of Palm Springs v. Living Desert Reserve

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 1999No. E018472PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

J.Not infrequently, wealthy individuals, intending both to promote the common weal and to memorialize themselves, give property to a city on the condition that it be used in perpetuity for some specified purpose. With disturbing regularity, however, the city soon tires of using the donated property for the purpose to which it agreed when it accepted the gift, and instead seeks to convert the property to some other use.

In this case, for instance, the City of Palm Springs (City) built a golf course on 30 acres of donated property which it had accepted in 1986 on the express…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Terry v. BenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. DuffillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. L.B. Research & Education Foundation v. UCLA FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Botelho v. GriffinAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. County of Solano v. HandleryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Canyon Vineyard Estates I v. DeJoriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. Petty v. The Corcoran Gallery of Art CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API