Legal Opinion

State v. Higgins

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 23, 1897PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Petition by Peter Higgins, in the original jurisdiction of this Court, for writ of habeas corpus. Writ granted, and petitioner discharged by order of this Court, April 29,1897.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice McIver.

This was an application, addressed to this Court, in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, by the defendant, for a discharge under a writ of habeas corpus. It appears from the sheriff’s return do the writ that the defendant was committed to his custody, “By virtue of an order of arrest for the violation of act No. 98, laws of 1896, in that being a citizen of the county of Charleston, he did catch fish for profit in the waters of Berkeley County, to me directed, a copy of which, annexed, I transmit to you.”

The only question…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Harper v. GallowaySupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  2. McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. HammondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  4. Carroll v. Town of YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  5. Barker v. State Fish CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API