Legal Opinion

United States v. Durham

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 9, 1965No. 18,542PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

Arraigned and tried before a general court-martial convened at Eglin Air Force Auxiliary Field Number 9, Florida, upon a single specification of robbery, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 122, 10 USC § 922, the accused were duly convicted and each sentenced to bad-conduct discharge, forfeiture of $50.00 per month for nine months, and confinement at hard labor for a like period. With some reduction in the adjudged penalties, intermediate appellate authorities *480affirmed, and we granted accused’s petition for review upon the assertion:

“d.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Runkle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. McClaughry v. DemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Swaim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  5. United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wright v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. SingletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  3. United States v. ColemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  4. United States v. SaundersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  5. United States v. ByersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API