Legal Opinion

United States v. Byers

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 27, 1992No. ACMR 9101023PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of willful disobedience of a superior commissioned officer and wrongful use of cocaine in violation of Articles 90 and 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 890 and 912a (Supp. V 1987) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The approved sentence included a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for thirty days, and reduction to Private El.

Although the appellant has raised several errors both through counsel and personally pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. Runkle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. McClaughry v. DemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. United States v. BlaylockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. MarshUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. ByersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. ShinerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API