Legal Opinion

General Electric Co. v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided May 28, 2013No. Civil Action No. 3:10-CV-276-FPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF GENERAL ELECTRIC

ROYAL FURGESON, Senior District Judge.

*? Table of Contents

I. Background............................................................586

II. Policy Underlying The Inequitable Conduct Doctrine........................588

III. Standard for Finding Inequitable Conduct .................................590

IV. Summary of the Court’s Findings.........................................590

V. '705 Patent History.....................................................594

A. The Filing of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  4. Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Critikon, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Becton Dickinson Vascular Access, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Worldwide Home Products, Inc. v. Bed, Bath & Beyond, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. U.S. Well Services, LLC v. Liberty Energy, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API