Worldwide Home Products, Inc. v. Bed, Bath & Beyond, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Worldwide Home Products, Inc. (“Plaintiff’), moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to alter, amend, vacate, or set aside the September 30, 2013, Memorandum Opinion and Order (the “Order”) and Clerk’s Judgment entered by the Court in favor of Defendants, Bed, Bath & Beyond, Inc. and Cohesion Products Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”). In the Order, the Court granted summary judgment in Defendants’ favor on Plaintiffs patent infringement claims and found that Plaintiffs patent, U.S. Patent Number…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Rojas v. Roman Catholic Diocese of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pig Newton, Inc. v. Boards of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension PlanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015