Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Howmet Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 2013No. Docket No. 303783PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This case involves a dispute between two insurers of a single employer concerning who must pay wage-loss benefits to an employee who suffered two separate, distinct injuries. Defendant Howmet Corporation (Howmet) and its workers’ compensation insurer, Pacific Employers Insurance Company/Cigna (Pacific), appeal as on leave granted1 an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission (the commission), now named Michigan Compensation Appellate Commission,2 ordering Howmet to pay benefits including wage-loss benefits related to the cervical spine injury of plaintiff, Edwin A. Nichols, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dressler v. Grand Rapids Die Casting Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Sington v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Perez v. Keeler Brass Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nichols v. Howmet Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API