Legal Opinion

Dziekonski v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 2, 1999No. 1105, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIEME, Judge.

Appellant, Pamela Dziekonski, was charged with assault in the second degree and disorderly conduct. A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County found her guilty of disorderly conduct and the court imposed a generally suspended sentence. Appellant noted a timely appeal and presents three questions for our review:

I. Did the trial court err in its instructions to the jury?

II. Did the trial court admit prejudicial and irrelevant evidence?

III. Was the evidence sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction?

We answer appellant’s first question in the affirmative and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. MacK v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Barnes v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  3. Davidson v. Seneca Crossing Section II Homeowner's Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Livingston v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Moore v. PeitzmeierDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API