Legal Opinion
Davidson v. Seneca Crossing Section II Homeowner's Ass'n
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 31, 2009No. 527 September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODWARD, Judge.
Appellant, David S. Davidson, initiated this litigation by filing suit against appellees, Seneca Crossing Section II Housing Association, Inc. (“the Association”), Azadeh Kaider (“Azadeh”), Brian Kaider (“Brian”), Lourdes Sandoval (“Lourdes”), and Santiago Sandoval (“Santiago”). 1 The individual appellees are past and present members of the Association’s Board of Directors. The complaint, as amended, sought declaratory, injunctive, and mandamus relief regarding the administration of the Association, as well as damages for defamation. Appellees filed a counterclaim for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Anne Arundel County Board of Education v. NorvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- United Steelworkers of America AFL-CIO, Local 2610 v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Gohari v. DarvishCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shirley v. HeckmanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Anderson v. BursonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Presidential Bank, FSB v. 1733 27th St. SE LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Smith-Myers Corp. v. SherillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Maryland Department of State Police v. Maryland State Conference of NAACP BranchesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.