Legal Opinion

Bell v. Still

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 8, 1965No. 4345PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Justice.

The single question in this case is whether the probate court has jurisdiction to remove an independent executor for alleged mismanagement and malfeasance in the administration of an estate. The probate court and the district court on appeal concluded the probate court did not have this power. We affirm.

The case presents construction problems concerning Texas Probate Code Sec. 222 (b), Acts 1955, 54th Leg., p. 88, ch. 55, V.A.T.S. The statutory predecessor of this section governing removal of representatives was Art. 3467, Vernon’s Ann. Civ.Stat., which provided that an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Roy v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. DyerTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Calvert v. Fort Worth National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Boyles v. GreshamTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Cocke v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bunting v. PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Eastland v. Eastland, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  3. Corpus Christi Bank and Trust v. Alice National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Bell v. StillTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Alice National Bank v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API