Bunting v. Pearson
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Justice.
Prior to the adoption of the Texas Probate Code, V.A.T.S. 1 in 1955, this Court had repeatedly held that the general provisions of the Revised Statutes regulating the procedures for establishing claims against an estate were not applicable to claims against an estate administered by an independent executor. Smyth v. Caswell, 65 Tex. 379 (1886); Roy v. Whitaker, 92 Tex. 346, 48 S.W. 892, 49 S.W. 367 (1898); Fischer v. Britton, 125 Tex. 505, 83 S.W.2d 305 (1935). The court of civil appeals, in reversing a trial court judgment, has held that this rule was radically changed by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roy v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Bell v. StillTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Fischer v. BrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Bell v. StillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Smyth v. CaswellTexas Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Columbia Rio Grande Regional Hospital v. Stover, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Eastland v. Eastland, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- In the Estate of Gaines, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Corpus Christi Bank and Trust v. Alice National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Wood v. PaulusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.