Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. New v. Perry
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 28, 1996No. Civil A. 96-0033 PLFPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Army Specialist Michael G. New voluntarily enlisted in the United States Armed Fones for an eight year term, four of which were to be served in the “Regular component of those forces,” beginning on February 18, 1993. Pet.’s Ex. A, Enlistment Agreement. On January 13, 1996, just under three years after he reported for duty, Specialist New asked this Court to halt pending court martial proceedings against him and to remove him from the jurisdiction of the military justice system. The court martial concerned Michael New’s refusal to comply with an order…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- U.S. ex rel New, M. v. Rumsfeld, Donald H.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- New, Michael G. v. Perry, WilliamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States Ex Rel. New v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004