Legal Opinion
S.A. Healy Company v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 13, 1995No. 95-1072PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Chief Judge.
This is a sequel to S.A. Healy Co. v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District, 50 F.3d 476 (7th Cir.1995), where we affirmed a judgment of $1,574,021 for Healy in its diversity suit for breach of contract. During the litigation, Healy had made a settlement demand upon the sewage district of $1,125,000, which the district had rejected. Thirty-four days after the entry of judgment, Healy had moved the district court to award it double its taxable costs plus interest on the judgment at the rate of 12 percent from the date of the demand to the date on which the judgment is…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- First Bank of Marietta, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Patrick Hahn v. Daniel WalshCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Jane Doe, and Jane Roe and Jane Roe 2, Proposed-Intervenors-Appellants v. Oberweis DairyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Brian Uphoff and David Damon, Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Employees v. Elegant Bath, Ltd., Chuck Does It All, Inc., and Charles L. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.