Legal Opinion
Monsanto Co. v. Strickland
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided February 9, 2009No. Civil Action 4:05-3062-RBHPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
R. BRYAN HARWELL, District Judge.
This is an action for patent infringement. Liability was established by virtue of the defendants’ failure to file objections to the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Rogers. This court subsequently denied by Order of December 3, 2008 the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of damages. The parties agreed to waive a trial by jury on damages and submitted that issue to this Court.
A damages hearing was held on January 5, 2009. Present at the hearing were Jackson Barnes, Daniel C. Cox, and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Asgrow Seed Co. v. WinterboerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sociedad Espanola de Electromedicina y Calidad, S.A. v. Blue Ridge X-Ray Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2016