Legal Opinion
State v. Deal
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 2015No. 27185PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Justice.
[¶ 1.] David Deal was convicted of first-degree rape and sexual contact with a child under the age of 16. Deal alleges that the circuit court committed reversible error when it denied his motion for judgment of acquittal and his motion to suppress statements in violation of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). We affirm.
Background
[¶ 2.] In August of 2013, Deal hosted a hog roast at his cabin outside of Vermillion, South Dakota. L.S.S. attended the hog roast with his daughter L.S., age seven at the time, and her younger sister…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BauschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. SpaniolSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. McCahrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Berry v. FlukeDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
- State v. BauschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.