Legal Opinion

Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Amersham PLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 21, 2012No. Nos. 02 Civ. 8448(RJS), 03 Civ. 3816(RJS), 03 Civ. 3817(RJS), 03 Civ. 3819(RJS), 03 Civ. 8907(RJS), 04 Civ. 1555(RJS), 04 Civ. 4046(RJS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Enzo Biochem, Inc. and Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. (collectively “Enzo” or “Plaintiffs”) bring these actions for patent infringement against Defendants.1 Before the Court is Defendants’ joint motion for summary judgment that some of the accused products (1) do not infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 4,994,373 (the “'373 Patent”), 5,328,824 (the “'824 Patent”), and 5,449,767 (the “'767 Patent”), either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, and (2) do not infringe certain other patents because they were manufactured with…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Brown v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Serby v. First Alert, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API