Lent v. Shear
California Supreme Court
' Appeal from the District Court, Fourth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sawyer, J.
Appellant relies principally upon the cases of Lord v. Morris, 18 Cal. 484, and McCarthy v. White, 21 Cal. 501. Respondents insist that there are elements in this case which distinguish it from the cases cited, and withdraw it from the operation of the Statute of Limitations as construed in those cases. If mistaken in this, respondents’ counsel then earnestly insist that those decisions are erroneous, and urge the Court to re-examine the questions decided, and if found to be so, to overrule the cases.
Mr. Justice Norton, in McCarthy v. White, said: “ I concur in the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Schmucker v. SibertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Wood v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Barber v. BabelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Sichel v. De CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- California Raisin Growers' Ass'n v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.