Legal Opinion

Nesbitt v. Hopkins

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided March 1, 1995No. 4:CV91-3364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KOPF, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on Magistrate Judge David L. Piester’s report and recommendation (Filing 104) suggesting that Petitioner’s petition for habeas corpus be denied. Petitioner filed a lengthy objection (Filing 109) to the report and recommendation. Petitioner has also appealed from Judge Piester’s order (Filing 108) denying an evidentiary hearing. By letter (Filing 112) Petitioner apparently requests that additional counsel be appointed to assist him. Finally, Petitioner has filed a motion for extension of time (Filing 114) to file an…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edward Kruelski, Jr. v. State of Connecticut Superior Court for the Judicial District of Danbury and Geographical Area 3 at DanburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Thomas Edward Nesbitt v. Frank X. Hopkins, Warden, Nebraska State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Edward Kruelski, Jr. v. State of Connecticut Superior Court for the Judicial District of Danbury and Geographical Area 3 at DanburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. Thomas E. Nesbitt v. Frank X. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API