Legal Opinion
Tennison v. Henry
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 21, 2001No. C-98-3842-CS(JCS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY [Docket No. 37]
SPERO, United States Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner John J. Tennison’s Motion For Discovery came on for hearing on Friday, July 27, 2001. For the reasons stated below, Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
Petitioner, John J. Tennison, was convicted of first-degree murder on October 8, 1990, and is currently serving a twenty-five-year to life sentence. Petition for Habeas Corpus at 1. On October 5, 1998, Tennison filed a Petition for Habeas Corpus in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company v. United States of America and the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Swan v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- State of Nevada v. Hazel R. O'leary, Secretary of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tennison v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Sherman v. McDanielDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
- Williams v. EngenAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- (DP)(HC) Horning v. BroomfieldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Jones v. Hamm (DEATH PENALTY)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.