Legal Opinion

In the Interest of K. R.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2001No. 00-0907PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht

The “harmless error” rule, Rule 4 4.1(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, states in part that “[n]o judgment may be reversed on appeal on the ground that the trial court made an error of law unless the court of appeals concludes that the error complained of ... probably caused the rendition of an improper judgment....” In the case now before us, a divided court of appeals, en banc, held that to apply this rule to a judgment terminating a parent-child relationship when the trial court erred by keeping the defendant, a prison inmate on release, handcuffed during the trial in sight of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Holick v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  4. in the Interest of Z.M., W.M., and L.M., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
  5. In Re CHTexas Supreme Court · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API