Legal Opinion
Lahman v. Bassel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 10, 1962No. 38805PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
C. R. Bassel and Bess L. Bassel, defendants in error, commenced proceedings to quiet full title to certain lands in Harmon County, Oldahoma. Plaintiffs in error, de--fendants below, asserted ownership in an undivided one-half interest in the minerals and by cross-petition sought to quiet their title to said one-half interest.: The lower court rendered judgment for-the plaintiffs and defendants appealed. The parties will be referred to by name or as they appeared in the trial court.
FACTS
The facts are undisputed. In 1929, John Lahman (father of the defendants), then the fee owner…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Whitman v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Leidig v. HoopesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Westcott v. BozarthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Dwelle v. GreenshieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nilsen v. Tenneco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Barber v. FlynnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- MacK Oil Company v. LaurenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Hudson v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Rox Petroleum, L.L.C. v. New Dominion, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.