Legal Opinion

Bayley & Sons, Inc. v. Braunstein Bros.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 3, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Bayley & Sons, Incorporated, against the. Braun-stein Bros. Company. On final hearing. Decree for complainant.

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff, suing on design patent No. 49,593 and mechanical patent No. 1,153,454, seeks to recover an injunction and damages for infringement. It also charges unfair competition growing out of the infringement of the design patent. Both the plaintiff and defendant are engaged in manufacturing lighting fixtures. The patent in suit is an electric light fixture known to the trade as “Equalite,” and is described by the witnesses as having an art glass reflector, umbrella shaped (also called bell-shaped), with a straight lower edge suspended from a rod or a chain pendant and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Graff, Washbourne & Dunn v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  3. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co. v. AlderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  4. Railroad Supply Co. v. Hart Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
  5. Mygatt v. SchafferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sinko v. Snow-Craggs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  2. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co. v. Worth Featherweight Pen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  3. Bayley & Sons, Inc. v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  4. Royal Lace Paper Works v. U. S. Lace Paper Works, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1935
  5. National Machine Works, Inc. v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API