Legal Opinion
Royal Lace Paper Works v. U. S. Lace Paper Works, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 18, 1935No. 7495PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is an action in equity, based on the alleged infringement by the defendant of design patent, No. 80,318, issued by the United States Patent Office to Edward Karfoil, for design for a doily, granted January 14, 1930, on an application filed August 27, 1929.
The said design patent was duly assigned by the said inventor to the plaintiff Royal Lace Paper Works, by an assignment in writing duly dated on the 2d day of February, 1935, and recorded'in the Patent Office on February 5, 1935, in Liber D 162, page 446, and plaintiff is now the lawful owner and holder of said…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lehnbeuter v. HolthausSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Herman v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Ashley v. Weeks-Numan Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Williams Bros. Well Treating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Boston Leather Specialty Co. v. Vatco Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1937