Legal Opinion

City of Louisville v. Puritan Apartment Hotel Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 12, 1954PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, Justice.

Separate actions were instituted by the Puritan Apartment Hotel Company and the ■Cavalier Apartment Company, appellees, against the City of Louisville. and certain property owners. The issues are the same in both cases and the appeals have been •considered together.

Appellees charged that ordinances 260 ■and 261, series 1951 of the City of Louisville, which rezoned two lots on the north■east corner of Fourth and Ormsby Streets, and another lot on the southeast comer of tjie same intersection are unreasonable, •arbitrary and void.

The lower court held the ordinances void on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Obier, City Building InspectorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. City of Dallas v. LivelyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Polk v. AxtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  4. Schloemer v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  2. Shemwell v. SpeckCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  3. City of Louisville v. Bryan S. McCoy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  4. City of Horse Cave v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
  5. Johnson v. LagrewCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API