Legal Opinion
Arrowhead Co. v. The Aimee Lykes
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 30, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, District Judge.
Respondents have moved this court for a change of venue pursuant to Section 1404(a) of Title 28 U.S.C.A., so as to transfer this action to Southern District of Alabama, Southern Division.
A similar motion previously made to this very court was denied ón the grounds that the moving papers were absent of sufficient facts in detail to warrant the exercise of the court’s discretion; no order having been entered on such prior motion, the court will hear this as a reargument granted on the showing of additional facts.
Libelant opposes this motion on the very basic question of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Untersinger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Orr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. American Mail Line, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Crawford v. Ann Arbor R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
3Cited by5 opinions
- Internatio-Rotterdam, Inc. v. ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Petition of BackmanDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1954
- Hercules Company v. S/S AramisDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1964
- Internatio-Rotterdam, Inc. v. Honorable Roszel C. Thomsen, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, and the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Gesamer Corporation v. Honorable Roszel C. Thomsen, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, and the United States District Court for the District of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- In re National Bulk Carriers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956