Legal Opinion

Loomis v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1911PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs are dealers in produce residing at Victor, but buying and shipping from Lakeside, New York, where they are represented by the firm of Furber, Connell Norton. D.P. Reynolds Co. are produce dealers in Jersey City, New Jersey, where their place of business is in the freight yard of the Lehigh Valley railroad at Grand street. They sell and deliver produce from the railroad cars as they stand in the yard at that point.

Early in June, 1907, D.P. Reynolds Co. ordered a carload of potatoes from the plaintiffs at 85 cents per bushel, delivered, payable on presentation of a sight draft…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Lossing v. . CushmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1909

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Higgs v. De MaziroffNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Taylor v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. F. S. Buffum Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Watkins Salt Co. v. MulkeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
  5. Rajala v. Allied Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API