Legal Opinion

Woeste v. Washington Platform Saloon & Restaurant

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 2005No. C-050030PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sylvia S. Hendon, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Kimberly Woeste, administrator of the estate of Thomas Woeste, has appealed, on behalf of the estate’s beneficiaries, the trial court’s grant of summary judgment without explanation in favor of defendantsappellees, Washington Platform Saloon & Restaurant (‘Washington Platform”) and Johnny’s Oyster and Shrimp, Inc. (hereinafter, “Johnny’s”).

Vibrio Vulnificus

{¶ 2} Thomas Woeste died as a result of contracting the bacteria vibrio vulnificus after eating raw oysters at Washington Platform. Vibrio is a naturally occurring bacteria in oysters that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Howard v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Crislip v. TCH Liquidating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Pusey v. BatorOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Edwards v. Hop Sin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aaron Bissinger v. New Country BuffettCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  2. Gonzalez Cabán v. JR SeafoodSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2017
  3. Maureen Horan v. Dilbet IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. Stefansky v. Cantina Laredo Columbus/Nashville, L.P. c/o CT Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API