MARCHENA
Board of Immigration Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #1767 MArratt OF MAIICRENA In Adjustment of Status Proceedings A-12500020. Decided by Regional Commissioner August 15, 1967 Where an alien's conviction under the second clause of 18 U.S.C. 1001 mar have been for making a false statement, it cannot be assumed that her plea of guilty concerned a fraudulent statement; therefore, the crime cannot be held to in- volve moral turpitude. Notwithstanding, her application for adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident pursuant to the provisions of section 1 of the Act of November 2, 1968, is denied, as a matter of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. LadleyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1931
- ESPINOSABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1962
3Cited by10 opinions
- Elkins v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Marek PARTYKA, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Rodriguez-Castro v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- City of Philadelphia v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- RIVENSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.