Legal Opinion

MARCHENA

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1967No. 1767PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #1767 MArratt OF MAIICRENA In Adjustment of Status Proceedings A-12500020. Decided by Regional Commissioner August 15, 1967 Where an alien's conviction under the second clause of 18 U.S.C. 1001 mar have been for making a false statement, it cannot be assumed that her plea of guilty concerned a fraudulent statement; therefore, the crime cannot be held to in- volve moral turpitude. Notwithstanding, her application for adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident pursuant to the provisions of section 1 of the Act of November 2, 1968, is denied, as a matter of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. LadleyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1931
  2. ESPINOSABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1962

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Elkins v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Marek PARTYKA, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Rodriguez-Castro v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. City of Philadelphia v. SessionsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. RIVENSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API