Legal Opinion

State v. Rush

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 24, 1991No. 23426PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant challenges the constitutionality of Act No. 532, § 9,1988 Acts 4644, which amended S.C. Code Ann. § 56-5-2940. We reject his arguments and affirm.

The amendment challenged in this appeal increased from five (5) to ten (10) years the period of time a prior conviction for driving under the influence (DUI) may be considered for determining whether an offense is a second or subsequent offense. The ten (10) year period is applicable to all DUI offenses committed on or after January 1, 1989, the effective date of the amendment.

Appellant was convicted of DUI in 1983. In the present case,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Califano v. WebsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Sperry & Hutchinson Company, Plff. In Err., VSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Williams v. WalshSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. State v. DabneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GroveSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. State ex rel. Lemmon v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. J.K. Construction, Inc. v. Western Carolina Regional Sewer AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Lemmon v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. Farley, Unpublished Decision (10-30-1998)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API