Legal Opinion

State v. Dabney

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 16, 1990No. 23195PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants pled guilty to or were convicted of driving under the influence (DUI). All had previous DUI convictions that they assert were erroneously used in calculating the level of the present offenses. We affirm.

South Carolina Code Ann. § 56-5-2940 (Supp. 1989) establishes the penalty for first offense DUI and for subsequent offenses, and provides the method for determining what previous offenses shall be included in calculating the appropriate penalty. Prior to May 21, 1981, the time period for consideration of previous offenses was ten (10) years. On May 21, 1981, the time period was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Gryger v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Hinson v. CoulterArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Furtick v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API