Legal Opinion

Sperry & Hutchinson Company, Plff. In Err., V

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 15, 1911PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

220 U.S. 502

31 S.Ct. 490

55 L.Ed. 561

SPERRY & HUTCHINSON COMPANY, Plff. in Err.,

v.

AIDA T. RHODES. N. 128. Argued April 19 and 20, 1911. Decided May 1, 1911. Mr. John Hall Jones for plaintiff in error. [Argument of Counsel from pages 502-504 intentionally omitted]

[504]

The court declined to hear Mr. Thomas E. O'Brien for defendant in error. djQ Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court: This is an action brought by the defendant in error for

1

[505]

2

using her photographed portrait for advertising purposes without her written consent first obtained. The facts were found against the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  5. Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. GroveSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API