Sperry & Hutchinson Company, Plff. In Err., V
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
220 U.S. 502
31 S.Ct. 490
55 L.Ed. 561
SPERRY & HUTCHINSON COMPANY, Plff. in Err.,
v.
AIDA T. RHODES. N. 128. Argued April 19 and 20, 1911. Decided May 1, 1911. Mr. John Hall Jones for plaintiff in error. [Argument of Counsel from pages 502-504 intentionally omitted]
[504]
The court declined to hear Mr. Thomas E. O'Brien for defendant in error. djQ Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court: This is an action brought by the defendant in error for
1
[505]
2
using her photographed portrait for advertising purposes without her written consent first obtained. The facts were found against the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. GroveSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.