Legal Opinion
Cranfill v. Scott & Fetzer Co.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided November 1, 1990No. Civ. A. No. S-82-0181-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COBB, District Judge.
The defendants, The Scott & Fetzer Co., and The Kirby Co. (Kirby), moved for partial summary judgment in this case on Counts I and II of the plaintiffs’, Jerry and Miller Cranfill (The Cranfills) complaint. This motion for partial summary judgment (Kirby’s first motion) was filed December 21, 1984. The Cranfills responded to Kirby’s First Motion on December 31, 1984, filing their response to defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment (The Cran-fills’ First Response).
*734On December 21, 1984, the same day Kirby’s First Motion was filed, the Cran-fills…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Knight v. International Harvester Credit Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Gladys G. Holloway v. Bristol-Myers CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Alfred Dunhill Limited and Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Interstate Cigar Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Dorothy Carlson v. The Coca-Cola Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Glendenning Companies, Inc., a Connecticut CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Magee v. Varsity Brands Holding Co IncDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025