Austin v. State

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Red River County of incest, and his punishment fixed at ten years in the penitentiary.

As qualified by the learned trial judge appellant’s first bill of exceptions presents no error. It was accepted and filed with the qualification attached. It appears that a physician, testifying for the State, was asked on direct examination as follows: "You say it was a normal child?” Witness answered, "No, I said that thé period of gestation was normal. The child . . .” At this point appellant objected upon the ground that the child’s…