Legal Opinion

State v. Arine

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1935No. 25493. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steinert, J. —

An information filed by the prosecuting attorney of Snohomish county charged two of the defendants named therein, Mitchell Thompson and David Arine, with the crime of robbery, and the third defendant, Saul Bender, with aiding and abetting the commission of the crime. Thompson pleaded guilty to the charge. Arine and Bender went to trial upon the information and were found guilty by the jury. This is an appeal by Arine from the judgment on the verdict.

The facts of the case fully appear in State v. Bender, ante p. 348, 47 P. (2d) 5, and will not be repeated here.

The first…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. WappensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Holmes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. State v. McGonigleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FairbanksWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State v. EakinsWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. EakinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. State v. EakinsWashington Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API